TV police psychic detective, author, and medium Noreen Renier from 2005 to 2012 utterly destroyed her reputation and credibility.

Her supporters in late 2011 and in early 2012 posted a fantasy tale that a "Psychic sues skeptic and wins in federal court!" But it's simply a clever marketing sham to promote a woman who has spun out of control pushing wild exaggerations.

In fact author, 'talk to the dead' medium, and psychic investigator actress Noreen Renier apparently will do anything to make sure her Facebook and book supporters remain confused about her own string of losses in federal courts. One federal judge in 2011 ruled Noreen Renier wasn't just lacking credibility but that she had misled the federal court! Two federal courts then further backed that court ruling in July 2011 and April 2012.

As of late April 2012 search engines like Bing and Google offer multiple postings (many anonymous) falsely claiming that YouTube, Facebook, and TV psychic detective medium Noreen Renier recently sued a skeptic writer and won. But the truth is different. Here are the facts as known to the G&P Inquiry Institute and presented commercial-free as a public service.

Noreen Renier has testified in court of engaging non-living entities named Sing and Robert who she claims speak through her. Recently she authored a book in which she claims to communicate back and forth in English with trees who have memories of historical events taking place around them. Like an oak tree she claims she talked who --- she claims ---described where rivers once flowed and talked about humans who had fought nearby. This particular oak tree was her informant.

Is Noreen Renier a credible and reputable psychic? Absolutely not. Noreen Renier falsely claims a formidable reputation with "hundreds" of law enforcement agencies --- but her claim is bogus.

And Noreen Renier rather than winning in court rooms against critics has actually lost every single lawsuit brought against her by one skeptical writer and critic across the past twenty years. Yet in December 2011 she posted material on her Facebook blog which implied to her supporters --- since they responded to the implication --- that she had just won a major lawsuit against her principal critic.

But court records show no such lawsuit won by Noreen Renier for decades in any U.S. court.

While Noreen Renier identifies herself as highly reputable and credible others do not.

U.S. federal judge William Anderson in March 2011 ordered a federal judgment against Noreen Renier ruling that she wasn't a credible witness and had misled his court! Four months later U.S. District Court judge Norman K. Moon in Virginia supported that decision and rejected her appeal as did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit --- a court immediately under the U.S. Supreme Court --- which ruled against Noreen Renier on April 18, 2012.

Yet Noreen Renier continues to act as if she has been winning court victories. In 2006 she told a reporter that she would win during a federal lawsuit brought against her by the same skeptic writer who has now won before six federal judges --- all of whom have ruled against Noreen Renier.

One of those judges noted in his order against Renier that ". . . the record before the court shows that it is impossible that Ms. Renier breached the agreement in this case without some level of fault.  She knew or should have known of the agreement, and breached it nonetheless."  Additionally the 2006 judge dismissed all of Noreen Renier's counter claims and noted "The court rejects Ms. Renier's claim that she did not breach the Settlement Agreement because her statements in [her book] A Mind for Murder are, according to her, true."  In April 2007 he ordered her to pay her critic what ultimately came to more than $41,000 with interest. Not exactly the credible psychic foresight she had claimed to the newspaper reporter.

Since 2005 several eye-witnesses have come forward and stated that Noreen Renier has horribly exaggerated and "boldly lied" about events and claims. Critics say she also continually revises many of her visionary failures to make them appear accurate. But these are just a glimpse into games and deceptions that lost and missing police psychic actress Noreen Renier as a TV star of the series 'Psychic Detectives' and 'Psychic Investigators' has played.

Updated April 30, 2012 as a G&P Inquiry Institute sub-set page within those at Noreen Renier profile index.

before

The letter was signed by Nancy Uzdavinis --- a woman who showed an southern Oregon address near Medford.

The letter arrived to the critic's home months before Noreen Renier filed a county lawsuit against him for libel. The critic politely responded to "Nancy Uzdavinis" in a personal note and even called her on the phone. He noted he was concerned about the claims "Nancy Uzdavinis" said Noreen Renier was making and that some of those claims by Noreen Renier appeared to be exaggerated.

Just weeks later the skeptic was sued by psychic Noreen Renier for libel. She won that lawsuit --- one rich in innuendo and falsehoods as uncovered by eye-witnesses later --- more than 25 years ago. It was her one and only win and it came in a small county court house while she was living in Phoenix Oregon --- a town which had a population in 1985 of less than 1900 residents.

The jury was just six people not twelve. Four were "neighbors" while the "big city" writer being sued came from more than 275 miles away --- Portland.

While never mentioning her lawsuit "win" was almost three decades ago and made in a southern Oregon county court house --- the current postings about her "incredible win" leave out far more.

More than five years after Noreen Renier filed her highly hyped 1985-1986 lawsuit an amazing discovery was made.

Multiple letters from Nancy Uzdavinis from the past were found including the one written to the critic Renier had sued.

Each hand written letter was signed Nancy Uzdavinis but each one was discovered to have been written by Noreen Renier herself! The 6-member jury who approved $25,000 in damages to Renier (barely covering her legal costs and about 9% of what she'd asked for in her lawsuit), were under the belief that the skeptical writer had started the conflict.

They never knew --- and Renier never disclosed --- that she had prompted actions by writing letters asking for his help to investigate herself --- all the while posing as Nancy Uzdavinis who needed to know the truth about a possible "phoney" Noreen Renier!

And an additional critic also uncovered yet another letter written to him also hand written by Noreen Renier according to an court handwriting expert and also signed with an alias.

As a principal star on the TV series Psychic Detectives Noreen Renier is a recognized actress who claims to be a real missing person and crime psychic investigator. But she isn't credible in her claims both before the public and in court rooms.

Sending letters to skeptical writers asking for their help --- while preparing to file lawsuits against them --- is just one means she uses. Indeed it was only after being challenged 5 years later in a Tennessee federal court that Renier admitted to writing the letters herself as Nancy Uzdavinis.

The letters were only discovered after the first critic began to sense he'd been "set up" years earlier by someone posing as "Nancy Uzdavinis" and wondered why "Nancy Uzdavinis" had first sought him out so urgently only to "disappear" once the lawsuit by Noreen Renier had begun.  It was years before he realized the Nancy Uzdavinis letters in his hands were actually created, hand written, addressed, and mailed by former stage actress Noreen Renier herself --- a woman who was never known as Nancy.

Amazingly one of the questions posed by Noreen Renier about herself --- in another letter Renier signed as Nancy Uzdavinis --- was the question "Is she a phony?"

Why did Noreen Renier need to send letters to skeptical writers asking for help in determining whether she is authentic?

The Tennessee critic who learned the truth too late responded with his own litigation.

His Knoxville based attorney Philip Lomonaco told a federal court that "Noreen Renier lied under oath when she stated she was not aware of any investigation of herself by [my client] . . . In actuality, Noreen Renier deceived John Merrell by sending him letters under the disguise of Nancy Uzdavinis. . . .In other words, Ms. Renier, through her deceitful letters, under the name of Nancy Uzdavinis, began the whole process, which culminated in Ms. Renier perjuring herself in an attempt to conceal the fact that she knew of Merrell's investigation. . . .Mr. Merrell was unaware that Noreen Renier had led him to investigating herself.  One truism rings clear in this whole situation; these parties would not be together had it not been for Ms. Renier's deceitful beginnings."

And a statement provided to a federal court judge from a handwriting expert indicates Renier wrote letters to at least two skeptic writers using the name Nancy Uzdavinis.

Renier herself finally admitted to writing the letters herself --- and filed an affidavit which indicated her permission to do so came from the real Nancy Uzdavinis who was her sister-in-law.

Merrell notes that "I've always suspected that affidavit was itself a bogus fantasy since when I spoke to the real Nancy Uzdavinis by phone she acted very nervous about being confronted with why she had provided permission and wasn't willing to actually vocalize that she had in fact given it."

Merrell charges that "It's not just the fact Renier pretended to be someone else.   Over many years she repeatedly has told the paranormal community that I started this three decade old battle.   But her deception had already begun when I first opened my mail from Noreen Renier posing as Nancy Uzdavinis and asking for my help.   Why did psychic actress Renier need to pretend to be someone else and send letters to skeptics asking for help in determining whether she is authentic?   Does the word entrapment months before filing a libel suit seem reasonable?   And why didn't Noreen Renier as a "super psychic" ever let the 1986 Oregon jury in on this secret little game she played? Indeed looking at the transcript her testimony dances around the fact that she already had contacted me first --- and not as she claimed --- had suddenly got a phone call from an unknown skeptic one evening. "

Amazingly Noreen Renier claimed in the Orlando Sentinal newspaper that "truth was my ally" in winning the 1985-1986 charade.

How often and how long Noreen Renier has pretended to be others --- including perhaps supporters of herself under a variety of names --- is unknown. But on March 21, 2011 a federal judge overseeing her second Chapter 7 bankruptcy rejected her attempts to keep her assets held by the court from being transferred to the very critic she misled 25 years before.

The judge noted that Noreen Renier "misled the court" and was not a credible witness. That order came after an earlier U.S. District Court ordered Renier to pay her critic more than $41,000 after interest ---again to the same man she misled 25 years before.

The decision that she is not a credible witness and misled a federal court stands after Renier lost appeals in July 2011 and again on April 18, 2012. Yet in early December 2011 Noreen Renier together with London based psychic Leo Bonomo and Sidney Australia writer Victor Zammit simultaneously released a marketing charade. Each posted material on blogs that Noreen Renier had won a lawsuit against the very critic that has actually won against her over the past decade --- including two recent federal rulings in two different courts in 2011.

Their December 2011 "breaking news" stories never mention a date, a court, or a court location. And the posting on Renier's own Facebook blog is followed up by a string of naive supporters congratulating her on a victory --- one they clearly believe is new.

Soon after a variety of "take-off" postings continue and are being made by those supporting a highly deceptive marketing charade to fool the public. They are either horribly naive or directly involved in supporting shams before families who are seeking the truth about the credibility of a woman who claims to find lost children.

The same woman a federal judge in 2011 found not credible. And who created a charade long ago she now uses as a foundation for yet another.

For more links to psychic Noreen Renier (often misspelled as Noreen Reneir) including her testimony in 1986 before the six member jury --- one where she falsely claims to have found a airplane with survivors --- visit the profile index page below. And when it comes to reports on 'Noreen Renier psychic detective' ignore most Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter postings --- they are mostly psychic marketing shams.